The Death of Stalin
| 2017Directed by: Armando Iannucci
Main Plot
The Death of Stalin is a dark political satire set in the Soviet Union during the aftermath of Joseph Stalin's death in 1953. The film follows the chaotic power struggle among the members of the Soviet government as they vie for control in the wake of Stalin's passing. As the news of his death spreads, key figures, including Nikita Khrushchev, Lavrentiy Beria, and others, engage in a series of manipulative and often absurd maneuvers to secure their positions and eliminate rivals. Amidst the backdrop of political intrigue, the film highlights the absurdity and brutality of the regime, showcasing the lengths to which these leaders will go to maintain power. The story unfolds with a mix of humor and horror, illustrating the paranoia and treachery that characterized the era, ultimately revealing the fragility of authority in a totalitarian state.
Characters
- Steve Buscemi plays Nikita Khrushchev, a cunning politician who maneuvers for power amidst the chaos following Stalin's death.
- Simon Russell Beale plays Lavrentiy Beria, the ruthless head of the Soviet secret police, who manipulates events and rivals to seize power after Stalin's death.
- Jeffrey Tambor plays Georgy Malenkov, who becomes the Soviet leader after Stalin's death, struggling with power dynamics and political chaos.
Ending Explained
The ending of The Death of Stalin culminates in a chaotic power struggle among the Soviet leadership following Joseph Stalin's death. As the remaining members of the Politburo vie for control, the atmosphere is rife with paranoia and betrayal. Key figures, including Nikita Khrushchev and Lavrentiy Beria, engage in a series of manipulative tactics to outmaneuver one another. Ultimately, Khrushchev emerges as the victor, orchestrating Beria's downfall by exposing his brutal tactics and crimes. This leads to Beria's arrest and execution, symbolizing the end of an era marked by fear and oppression. The film concludes with Khrushchev's ascension to power, suggesting a shift towards a more reformist approach, albeit still within the confines of the oppressive Soviet regime. The resolution of the main conflict highlights the absurdity and volatility of political power in the Soviet Union, illustrating how personal ambitions can lead to drastic consequences. The narrative underscores the theme of the fragility of authority and the often darkly comedic nature of political maneuvering, leaving viewers with a sense of both relief and unease about the future of the Soviet state.